Personal injury. Settle faster, with a complete record.

1. Status 01Intake

   Live conversational intake — Justine talks with the prospective client through the structured intake schema. Liability vector, mechanism of injury, jurisdiction, statute-of-limitations clock, sources of recovery. Phone, web, or in-firm.

2. Status 02Investigation

   Justine pulls and analyzes the police report, photos, scene documentation, and witness statements. Surfaces what the carrier is going to argue. Flags policy-limit caps and underinsured-motorist coverage.

3. Status 03Treatment

   The daily case auditor runs at 06:00 UTC against every open matter. Flags missed appointments, treatment gaps over threshold, and providers who haven’t reported in the contract window. The treatment chronology is always current.

4. Status 04Records

   Eight document analyzers — medical, police, insurance, IME, billing, legal, correspondence, evidence — chronologize the case in real time, up to 50,000 pages per matter, all read into one context. The nine-step Curation Layer runs after extraction: OCR Janitor, Provider Canonicalizer, ICD-10/CPT Code Validator, Incident-Date Splitter, Damages Authority Resolver, Encounter Coalescer, Lien Joiner, Composer Migration, and a Curation Report surfaced in the attorney’s Review Panel.

5. Status 05Demand

   The four-pass demand-letter pipeline: draft, medical-causation pass, damages quantification, four-layer QA. Every citation is verified against CourtListener. Curated case-law packs for the top ten PI states. The Generate Demand Package CTA assembles the cover letter, Medical Chronology exhibit, and Bill Stack exhibit into a single ZIP for service — best-effort exhibit composition with a manifest the attorney signs off on before send.

6. Status 06Negotiation

   Counter-offer analysis, adjuster pattern recognition (which adjusters lowball on which injury types, what their cap usually is), Brandt-fees calculator for bad-faith adjacents.

7. Status 07Litigation

   When the matter goes into suit: complaint and answer drafting, discovery management, deposition preparation, motion-in-limine prep, expert-witness management.

8. Status 08Settlement

   Settlement-matrix modeling, lien negotiation orchestration (Medicare, Medicaid, ERISA, providers), disbursement statement preparation, client-side settlement explainer.

9. Status 09Closeout

   Final case file delivery to the client, audit-log export for ethics review, post-mortem analysis for the firm’s internal pattern library. The case is closed; what the firm learned from it isn’t.

• Intake sub-agent

  Justine’s Workspace v1.2 — drop documents, watch fields populate with per-field provenance, validator-council confirmation, conflict-confirmation dialogs across sources. Liability vector. Mechanism of injury. Jurisdiction lookup. Statute-of-limitations clock. Coverage discovery. PIP / med-pay / UM/UIM identification. Client-conflict check.

  For example — A passenger in a rear-end collision on the I-5. You drop the police report, the ER intake form, and the registered-owner declaration page into the workspace. The intake sub-agent extracts each field — CA jurisdiction, 2-year SOL clock, at-fault carrier, layered UM coverage — and shows the source page for every extracted value. The validator council confirms the SOL clock and surfaces a single cross-source conflict on the named driver, which you resolve in the conflict-confirmation dialog before assembly.

• Medical sub-agent

  Provider chronology. Treatment-gap detection. ICD-10 code mapping. IME response. Medical-bill audit. Permanent impairment rating modeling. Causation linkage.

  For example — A 5,000-page record set across nine providers. The medical sub-agent surfaces the 19-day treatment gap that the carrier’s IME will exploit, the two PT notes that contradict the IME’s functional-capacity opinion, and the three records that establish causation to the underlying accident.

• Valuation sub-agent

  Special damages tally. General damages comparable analysis. Future-medical cost projection. Policy-limit awareness. Lien total. Jury-verdict comparables for the venue.

  For example — Special damages $87K. General damages comparables for L4-L5 disc herniation in San Diego County run $180K–$320K. Lien total $42K. Policy limit $100K + $250K UM. Pre-suit demand: $385K. Bottom-line authority: $215K.

• Strategy sub-agent

  Adjuster pattern. Demand framing. Negotiation tree. Mediation positioning. Filing decision. Discovery plan.

  For example — The carrier’s adjuster on this file settles soft-tissue claims under policy limit far more often when the demand leads with future-medical and includes a sworn provider affidavit — a pattern Justine draws from the adjuster’s own history on comparable matters. Justine recommends including the affidavit and structuring the opening number 15% above the projected acceptance range.

• Justine’s Workspace v1.2. Field-level provenance. Validator council. Liability and coverage discovery.

  Intake & investigation

  • Conversational intake — Justine's Workspace v1.2
  • Per-field provenance to source document
  • Validator council + cross-source conflict confirmation
  • Liability vector reasoning
  • Coverage discovery + policy-limit identification
  • Jurisdiction lookup + SOL tracking
• Eight document analyzers. Nine-step Curation Layer. Up to 50,000 pages per matter, all in one context.

  Medical & document intelligence

  • Medical-record chronology across providers
  • Police-report analysis
  • Insurance correspondence analysis
  • IME / DME response analysis
  • Medical-billing audit
  • Legal correspondence triage
  • Evidence catalogue + chain-of-custody
  • Treatment-gap detection (daily auditor)
  • Nine-step Curation Layer (OCR Janitor → Curation Report)
• Four-pass pipeline + four-layer QA. ICD-10/CPT validation. 50-state coverage. Top-10 states curated.

  Demand & negotiation

  • Demand-letter pipeline (4 passes + 4 QA layers)
  • ICD-10 / CPT medical-codes pipeline + QA layer
  • Case-valuation modeling
  • Settlement-matrix analysis
  • Adjuster pattern recognition
• One-click bundle: cover letter + Medical Chronology exhibit + Bill Stack exhibit + audit row.

  Demand package assembly

  • Demand Package orchestrator (one-click bundle)
  • Medical Chronology Composer (Exhibit A PDF)
  • Bill Stack Composer (Exhibit B PDF)
• Long-context reasoning across the full case file.

  Litigation & discovery

  • Deposition preparation + analysis
  • Discovery management
  • Expert-witness research and management
  • Motion-in-limine preparation
• Lien orchestration. Audit log. Pattern library.

  Settlement & closeout

  • Lien negotiation orchestration
  • Settlement disbursement preparation
  • Audit-log export (ethics-grade)
  • Post-matter pattern library

• Intake reasoning

  Justine found — Drop the police report, the ER intake form, and the carrier’s declaration page. Justine reads every page, extracts the jurisdiction, the at-fault carrier, and the layered UM/UIM coverage — and shows the source page behind every value, with a validator council confirming the statute clock before assembly.

• Medical chronology

  Justine found — Across 5,000 pages and nine providers: the 19-day treatment gap the carrier’s IME will exploit, the two PT notes that contradict its functional-capacity opinion, and the three records that establish causation back to the collision.

• Case valuation

  Justine found — Special damages $87K. Venue comparables for an L4-L5 disc herniation in San Diego County run $180K–$320K. Lien total $42K against a $100K policy plus $250K UM. Pre-suit demand: $385K. Bottom-line authority: $215K.

• Deposition analysis

  Justine found — Cross-referenced the defendant’s Day-3 deposition against his Day-1 recorded statement and the police report — three inconsistencies on speed and following distance, and a ready cross-examination sequence built from his own prior words.

• Negotiation strategy

  Justine found — When the demand leads with future-medical and a sworn provider affidavit, this adjuster’s own claim history shows a markedly higher rate of settling soft-tissue cases under policy limit. Justine framed the opening number 15% above the projected acceptance range — with the supporting authority already attached.

• Viability + deadlines

  Justine found — Scored the matter 85/100 — citing both treating physicians, a clean liability picture, and a statute-of-limitations deadline 21 days out — and surfaced it in the 06:00 briefing alongside the two other matters that need you today.

• Conflict + citation discipline

  Justine found — Caught a prior representation of the opposing driver before the engagement letter went out. And every statute and case Justine cites is grounded against a verifiable authority on CourtListener — reasoned from real law, never invented.

The AI reasons; the attorney decides.

Three on-ramps. Same Justine.

• Solo and small (1–5 attorneys)

  Self-serve trial

  14-day free trial. No credit card. Cancel anytime. Onboarding documentation + in-product workflow guidance. For small practices ready to evaluate without a procurement cycle.

  Start a free trial →

• Mid-size (6–25 attorneys)

  Sales-assisted

  Demonstrated on your matters. Onboarding handled by a JustineAI™ engineer. Migration support from existing case-management software. Configurable to your workflow.

  Talk to our team →

• Enterprise (25+ attorneys)

  Enterprise procurement

  Custom MSA. DPA negotiation. Optional customer-managed keys. Dedicated tenant isolation. Compliance evidence package. SAML / Microsoft Entra ID single sign-on.

  Talk to procurement →