How the WC edition works.

JustineAI™ WC runs the same compositional fabric as the PI edition — Eve-Legal F5/reasoner, one Justine supervising stage-specialized sub-agents in a single 10M-token context. What changes is the calibration. Each deep-dive below describes a mechanism this edition carries today for applicant-side California practice. Rating, apportionment, and settlement figures are projections the attorney verifies against the current schedule.

• 01Med-legal

  How Justine scrutinizes the AME and PQME report

  The medical-legal report is the case. Justine reads it the way an appeals board does — line by line, against the record. Applicant-side; California, Georgia, and Texas.

  Read deeper →
• 02Value Engine

  How the PD Value Engine models the rating

  From WPI to the governing state’s rating — California’s PDRS string shown here in full — a percent, a dollar value, and the swing between a strict-AMA rating and a rebutted one, shown, sourced, and left for the attorney to certify.

  Read deeper →
• 03Med review

  How Justine defends against UR and IMR denials

  A treatment denial runs on a tight clock and a narrow record. Justine builds the challenge before the deadline closes.

  Read deeper →
• 04Settlement

  How Justine models settlement and net-to-client

  C&R or Stips, with the fee and liens applied — Justine shows net-to-client under each path before the attorney commits a number.

  Read deeper →
• 05MSA

  How Justine flags the Medicare set-aside

  Justine flags when a WCMSA is implicated before a C&R is papered — a flag and analysis, never a dollar calculator.

  Read deeper →